There is a lot of discussion about Ron Paul’s “nutty” foreign policy which has caused many to take a serious look at this thing called non- interventionism. Non – interventionism is a foreign policy which holds that political rulers should avoid alliances with other nations, while maintaining diplomacy, and avoid all wars except in self-defense. This is based on the grounds that a state should not interfere in the internal politics of another state, based upon the principles of Freedom and Liberty. Some famous supporters of non-interventionism are US Presidents George Washington and Thomas Jefferson.
Unfortunately, the press has made a side show mockery of the foreign policy of our founding fathers in their effort to demean and marginalize believers in non-interventionism. Their effort has been largely effective but at what cost? The second and I believe more importantly is that in their effort they have created a pro war mentality in Patriots and Christians that is most disturbing. We have forgotten why we as a nation were and should be anti-war. We must hold to the belief that, ALL wars are bad and only some are necessary,
When war becomes a national policy the result is freedom and liberties are lost. James Madison said it best when he said, “No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare.” Thomas Jefferson said, “Having seen the people of
all other nations bowed down to the earth under the wars and prodigalities of their rulers, I have cherished their opposites, peace, economy, and riddance of public debt, believing that these were the high road to public as well as private prosperity and happiness.” Americas first President George Washington said, “Over grown military establishments are under any form of government inauspicious to liberty, and are to be regarded as particularly hostile to republican liberty.” The big question is; if it was good for our nation’s founding and practiced by our founding fathers what changed? Is it the principles that changed or the people? Of course we know the answer because principles never change and people always do.
As a Christian I have a Biblical world view, so let’s look at war from a Biblical perspective. The source of war according to the Bible is sin. It is sin that brought evil into this world and it is sin that causes men to do evil things. James 4:1-3 says it best, ‘From whence come wars and fightings among you? come they not hence, even of your lusts that war in your members? Ye lust, and have not: ye kill, and desire to have, and cannot obtain: ye fight and war, yet ye have not, because ye ask not. Ye ask, and receive not, because ye ask amiss, that ye may consume it upon your lusts.
If we know what the enemy is then we can know how to defeat it. 2 Corinthians 10:3-4 says, ‘for though we walk in the flesh, we do not war after the flesh: (For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds;) “Trying to defeat sin using guns and bombs is like trying to kill an elephant with a fly swatter, it simply won’t work and end up causing great harm to ourselves. Of course the answer is to use spiritual weapons instead. In Ephesians 6:12-13 it says, “For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.”
But what does the Bible say about the carnal war? What do you think we should have done in WWII when a nation like Germany commits such great atrocities against humanity? According to the Bible some war is unavoidable, Mark 13:7 And when ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars, be ye not troubled: for such things must needs be; but the end shall not be yet. In the Bible there are many examples of how God used the people as instruments of His wrath. Romans 13:4 explains it this way, “For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil. So while God teaches us to avoid and eschew war he also give examples of when war is justified.
But what exactly is a “Just War”? St. Augustine and St Thomas Aquinas are considered the authors of the Just War theory. There premise is first that it is a fundamental Christian belief that war should be eliminated and peace and brotherly love should be promoted throughout the world. Secondly, they believe that in an imperfect world there will be time when war cannot be avoided and ultimately forced upon those who have no desire for war. The basic tenants of a Just war are as
follows:
1. Just Cause – Only a defensive war is legitimate.
2. Just intent – The purpose of a just war is to create peace.
3. Last resort – A just war is the last resort for the combatants.
4. Formally declared – No just war should be fought without a formal declaration by the highest authority.
5. Limited objectives – If the purpose of war is peace, then total economic, political or social destruction can never be the end.
6. Proportional means – Force should be limited to stop aggression and deter future attacks.
7. Non-combatant Immunity – Individuals not contributing to the conflict should be exempt from attack.
These are the fundamental principles of a Just War and should be adhered to in the event war is inevitable.
A good book to read is War: Four Christian Views by Robert G.Clouse.
The conclusion of the matter is rather quite simple. First All wars are bad only, some are necessary. Secondly, wars and foreign entanglements were looked upon by our founders as bad and endangered freedom and liberty. Thirdly, if you are a believer we must understand war is not an option but rather a last resort. By the way that is the definition for non- interventionism. So the next time you hear or read reports from the main stream media slamming non-interventionism remind them that non-interventionism IS main stream and war was and never will be.
The State of Arkansas has had five different state constitutions. The current constitution was approved by a 3 to 1 majority during a period when Arkansans were distrustful of government. From the Civil war to a military regime and political reconstruction the citizens of Arkansas were leery of government in general and the constitution was written to be restrictive to government and protective of the citizenry.
Beginning with Ar 1 Section 1 it states; All political power is inherent in the people and government is instituted for their protection, security and benefit; I find it
interesting to note that the authors felt it was critical to establish who was in charge in the State of Arkansas. Next they go on to further state in Sec 22, The right of property is before and higher than any constitutional sanction; and private property shall not be taken, appropriated or damaged for public use, without just compensation therefor.This make it very clear that property rights are the most important right in Arkansas. Finally in Sec 28 this statement declares how little the property can be encumbered by stating, All lands in this State are declared to be allodial; and feudal tenures of every description, with all their incidents, are prohibited.
What is allodial land you might ask? Allodial lands are the absolute property of their owner and not subject to any service or acknowledgment to a superior. An allodial title is the opposite of a feudal tenure such as fee simple. Allodial Title is a concept in
some systems of property law. It describes a situation where real property (land, buildings and fixtures) is owned free and clear of any encumbrances, including liens, mortgages and tax obligations. Allodial title is inalienable, in that it cannot be taken by any operation of law for any reason whatsoever.
So why is it important to understand all this stuff? The answer is because in Arkansas there is a great assault on property rights from the Maumelle watershed to the ETJ. (extra territorial jurisdiction) Property rights are being taken away at an
alarming rate. Consider all of the rules and regulations placed upon our land with no consideration to the landowner’s desire or rights. Consider the lands that have lost value because of code restrictions and subdivision rules. All of these things are being done outside the authority of the Arkansas constitution.
It’s about time we begin reasserting our rights and rebuking those who would attempt to restrict devalue and even take what they have no right to. If we cannot protect our land rights we will not be able to protect individual rights. Get educated and get engaged and we can restore freedom and liberty in Arkansas.
Bill pre-filing for the state’s second Fiscal Session of the Arkansas General Assembly opened Monday. Only appropriation bills and resolutions can be pre-filed. If a legislator wants to introduce a bill addressing an issue other than an appropriation, they must file a resolution and that resolution would then require approval of both legislative bodies by a two-thirds majority before a non-appropriation bill can be filed. The deadline for filing Concurrent Resolutions for non-appropriation bills is Monday, February 13. The deadline for filing appropriation and non-appropriation bills is the fifteenth day of the Fiscal Session. Saturdays and Sundays count in the session’s total days. The filing deadline can be extended on a two-thirds vote. The Budget Session is limited to 30 days but could be extended one time for 15 days on a three-fourths vote.
The Joint Budget Committee is scheduled to meet at 9 a.m. on January 17, 18 and 19 to hold pre-session budget hearings on fiscal issues that will be considered during the Fiscal Session. These meetings will be held in Room A of the new Big Mac building located immediately to the northwest of the Capitol building.
Contact information when Legislature is in session:
State Senators: 501-682-2902
State Representatives: 501-682-6211
Let them know you want them to Freeze Spending, Find Waste Fraud and Abuse, Fund only Proper Role of Government.
Obama on Dec 30th, granted lawmakers request to postpone the decision to raise the debt ceiling 1.2 Trillion dollars so they would be in session during the 15-day period allowed for objections. Under an agreement negotiated between Congress and the White House this past summer, Congress has 15 days to vote on a resolution of disapproval for the debt limit hike once Obama submits the notification, but the president would be able to veto any such vote.
Democrats and Republicans fought all summer over the best way to control the country’s debt and deficit and even created a “Special Committee” of the wisest of the wise to “fix” what ails this economy and no surprise, they accomplished nothing. Now, under the August deal, the borrowing cap is raised automatically unless Congress can muster a two-thirds majority in both chambers to block the extension. Of, course this won’t happen so, “pop goes the weasel” another debt increase.
However something good can come of this if we get involved now, in the debate. It has been just shy of 1000 days since the United States government had a budget. It is no small wonder why the debt ceiling must be raised over and over again considering there is NOTHING TO RESTRAIN SPENDING! There is no budget and no debt limit, what do we think would happen? Do we believe Congress would exercise restraint; who are we kidding? So we must speak up now and tell them No Budget, No Debt Increase. This must be our conversation today, tomorrow and however long it takes, to right this sinking ship of fools.